
1. Athletes who perform long sprint events displayed a significant asymmetry between right
and left knee
flexor strength.
2. Athletes with a previous injury displayed no significant difference in knee flexor
strength compared to their
previously uninjured colleagues.
3. When normalized to bodyweight, male and female track and field athletes displayed similar
levels of eccentric
knee flexor strength.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
As in many sports, hamstring injury has been recorded as the number one cause of time loss
in track and field
athletes (1). Despite this knowledge, and also the knowledge that there is a correlation
between decreased
eccentric hamstring strength and increased risk of hamstring injury (2), there is not
currently any published
literature on eccentric hamstring strength in track and field athletes.
Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to compare peak and relative eccentric force
and limb symmetry
between different event groups and between genders. The secondary objective of the study was
to establish if
there were any peak force deficits among those previously injured.
METHODS
All athletes who completed this testing between 2016 and 2019 were eligible for the
study.
A standardized method of testing was used throughout this time period, whereby the athletes
completed testing
prior to any fatiguing training following a standardized warm up involving the bike and
single leg hamstring
bridges.
All 44 athletes who were involved in the study had their injury records retrospectively
collected and
analyzed.
RESULTS
The male track and field athletes showed a significantly greater peak force than females
(418N vs 318N), however
once normalized to bodyweight there was no significant difference seen throughout the whole
cohort of
athletes.
When this data was then broken down into different events, the short sprints athletes
displayed no significant
right to left-sided asymmetry, and this was also the case in field event athletes. However
there appeared to
be
Hamstring injury has been recorded as the number one cause of time loss in track and field
athletes.
As part of the athletes regular screening program, eccentric hamstring strength was measured
using the NordBord
device. In this test, players ankles are strapped into the device and load cells provide a
measure of eccentric
force production (see video).

a significant difference between right and left limbs in athletes in the long sprint event
group
(200-400m).
Interestingly, the study also found that there was no significant difference in eccentric
hamstring strength
between injured and non-injured limbs.
LIMITATIONS
The key limitation of this study as acknowledged by the authors is that all testing was
performed over a number
of sites by a number of therapists. There is therefore a risk of poor inter-tester
reliability, especially given
that this variable has not been previously quantified in the literature (3).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
This study revealed that when normalized according to body weight, track and field athletes
displayed the
greatest levels of eccentric hamstring strength compared to athletes from other sports.
These relative force
scores of 5.21N/kg and 4.91N/kg for male and female athletes respectively are higher than
those previously
reported in soccer, rugby union and Australian rules football.
This is an interesting finding as previous literature has suggested that greater levels of
eccentric knee flexor
strength are protective against hamstring injury. However, in this cohort of 44 athletes
almost three-quarters
had a history of hamstring injury. This highlights a fact that is true across all
field-based sports – even very
high levels of eccentric strength are not adequately protective against hamstring injury. It
is vital to address
all other proposed risk factors to try and maintain the training status of the athlete.
Another key finding from this paper is that the different events categorized within the
study displayed different
physical characteristics, with
Nordbord hamstring testing long sprint athletes demonstrating a profile of significant
asymmetry between the
right and left limbs. This was a profile not seen in field or short sprint athletes. Again,
this highlights the
importance of understanding the cohort of athletes that you are working with, as it could be
argued that by
trying to correct an asymmetry in long sprint athletes you are placing injury risk reduction
ahead of performance
maximization.
It could also be proposed that these athletes actually require an asymmetry to prevent
against injury due to the
asymmetrical nature of their sport (running a circular track). This is a fine balance and
one that must be
understood and fully discussed with the coach and the athlete. There may then be an
agreement in place
surrounding monitoring of what might be deemed an “acceptable” asymmetry.
The final key finding of this paper is that those athletes with a previous injury showed no
significant
difference in eccentric knee flexor strength compared to those without a hamstring injury
history. This is an
important finding as it demonstrates that with good quality rehabilitation and training
athletes are able to
restore desirable characteristics such as eccentric knee flexor strength. However, further
work needs to be done
to see if this is the same for other risk factors such as timing of muscle activation and
fascicle length.
SUPPORTING REFERENCES
1. Eduoard, P., Branco, P. & Alonso, J-M. (2016). Muscle injury is the principle injury type
and hamstring muscle
injury is the first injury diagnosis during top-level international athletics championships
between 2007 and
2015. British Journal of Sports Medicine,
2. Bourne, M.N., Opar, D.A., Williams, M.D. & Shield, A.J. (2015). Eccentric Knee Flexor
Strength and Risk of
Hamstring Injuries in Rugby Union: A Prospective Study. American Journal of Sports Medicine,
43(11),
2663-2670.
3. Opar, D.A., Williams, M.D., Timmins, R.G., Hickey, J., Duhig, S.J. & Shield, A.J. (2013).
A novel device using
the Nordic hamstring exercise to assess eccentric knee flexor strength: A reliability and
retrospective injury
study. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 43(9), 636-640.